UK

The Day It Got Worst – in London

May 22, 2013 by Leave a Comment

A Sacrifice to God - London 2013 — A Sacrifice to God – London 2013

This is a day everyone hoped will not come, a man stands in the street – in London, his hands bloody and his English sounds as good as can be, he apologizes to the camera about the fact that “women had to see this”. And by “this” he means that he (and another person) just murdered a person in the street – and decapitated him.

This man also says something even more important to note – referring to “their” lands, muslim countries, this is how it is. Of course it is, infidels are murdered and their heads are cut off, while screaming “god is great” to signal that this is a murder for the sake of god, because stone age gods ask for blood, and its got nothing to do with the person being killed, its got nothing to do with any diplomatic moves of the UK or any country, it simply is because he is not a muslim – and a muslim of the type and kind that is perfectly aligned to that of those who killed him.

Now wait to hear back from the English far right, they will say “we told you so” and unfortunately, they will be right.

When Jeremy Bentham Got Upset – UCL’s Wake Up Call

March 16, 2013 by Leave a Comment

UCL Debate becomes a show of Force to Sharia on Campus — Proud Atheist Would Not Accept Segregation in UCL

We know UCL from past posts, especially from the one that warned this top rate university (globally) of what is going on in its grounds when an Islamic association caused trouble on campus, it is only natural that this is what follows, because there is a high price for the lack of attention to the religious powers working their way into forcing everyone back in time – to the stone age.

A week ago, we are told, a debate on University College London campus was held with the notion of debating Islam against Atheism, the audience was stunned to discover that guards (yes, guards) were on site to make sure that male and female attendants will be physically separated. Something in UCL’s main hall must have cracked, that famous ghost of Jeremy Bentham must have gone wild with anger to discover that the university that he fathered, the first of its kind – to accept all without discrimination, and take full advantage of human potential has now turned to a backward, barbaric institution that does not believe women are equal to men, and even worst – that men need to be distanced from women or that will not be responsible for their actions.

How entitled the people of London and England been for the past hundred years that they let this fundamental human right slip away from them, how self hating they needed to be to get to a point that a bunch of religious nut cases can make their way in one of the worlds most celebrated educational establishments and implement the same rules that this university was created to crash?.

This wake up call was just about enough, and UCL announced that it is halting the activity of the student body that organized this specific event, probably for breaking each and every point of the university charter. So the official boss washed his hands off this, and the problem is solved. Also note that the “atheist” debater refused to take part of this barbarism and threatened to leave the debate unless humans beings were allowed to be sitted as they wished and not based on their gender.

One last thing, who gave Muslims and Islam the total property of all religions? Why, or rather how is it that Muslims feel that they are the ones to wage debates on atheists, when this kind of debate should have in it representatives of the two organized religions that preceded it (by many, many years) and who are clearly the full basis for Islam. Some went as far as to argue that the Koran is a simple plagiarism of the Bible and New Testimony together.

The answer is simple, with every passing day we witness the violent and ultra aggressive aspirations of this neo-Islam, to wipe out all other religions and take over as the only religion out there, which is in line with its totalitarian and dangerous philosophy.

Muslims: The Predictable Story

September 11, 2012 by Leave a Comment

In “Islam: The Untold Story” (UK channel 4) Tom Holland, the famous historian and writer presents something that should have been explosive in nature to most people in the West (and the East) today; the notion that Islam was invented (or rather – created) to serve the geopolitical changes in the world at the time of the Arab military expansion. In this documentary one does have the feeling that while this is some kind of common standard notion regarding Islam in the historical academic circles the wider audience had not been introduced to this idea yet.

Tom Holland is a fantastic writer, he delivers historical facts about the ancient world like a very small selected group of writers, and has the ability – and the knowledge – to present to his reader the world as it was thousands of years ago. He is a sharp and intelligent writer, a passionate historian of the best kind – the one who does not let go until he gets satisfying facts, and his criticizers should know that they are confronting a scholar that has nothing in mind but the search for the truth, he is no Islamophobic hate monger or a Saudi backed academic.

It is almost amazing that such an educated man would not know what kind of storm would follow his suggestion, it is virtually impossible to criticize Islam in any way, in any form and on any platform, the rage and death threats that follow each publication of any notion about Islam that is out of the conventional is a testimony to that. It must have been clear to Holland that such anger would follow, and it looks like he prepared for it by interviewing Dr Seyyed Hossein Nasr (professor of Islamic studies, George Washington University) who quickly and in a dry manner slaughters any of Holland’s ideas (this is roughly 5 minutes into the documentary) by saying no non Muslim can understand the historical roots of the religion, end of story. Holland gets back to good Dr Seyyed to get his blessing just before the program closes, and asks how should he present his arguments to the public, to which he gets a fluffy, foggy, “honesty is good” type of answer.

And indeed, once the show was on it got it fair share of rage and anger, as anything Islam related does, with the regular and boring “outrage” believers feel when confronted with a thoughtful and deep research presented by a scholar who knows much more about their origins than themselves. The foundation of faith are not to be shaken, even if those foundations might be built on political lies and deception 1,400 years old.

islam - the untold story is met with rage — Tom Holland goes after the historical truth and faces current day political intolerance

The George Galloway Show

September 5, 2012 by Leave a Comment

This is one hell of a video right there. George Galloway, a British MP imploring an arab audience (of which nationality is unclear, but this is not about nationality but about religion) and teasing them to start what he calls a “revolution” in Saudi Arabia, when it seems much more like he is simply calling Arabs to start inflicting a Syrian like human suffering in Saudi Arabia.

Whenever the argument goes into a narrower path, he dangles the Americans and the Jews to the audience – because if the Americans and Jews are happy Arabs can not be, and if they are happy at the same time, well it means something is very wrong – according to Galloway.

It had only been a question of time when Galloway will go back to his questionable support and love of the Syrian regime, he had been a true supporter in the past, only to have to twist and turn at the beginning of the Syrian violence (more than a year ago). Now it seems that he is back in full force, and with the ultimate weapon, the Palestinians. But the Palestinian argument is slowly fading away, even from Arab crowds. In the whole Israeli Palestinian conflict there was never a day-by-day bloodletting festival of violence as has been demonstrated in Syria. While generations of Syrians have been oppressed by a tribal and religious minority children in Gaza grow up without even once seeing an Israeli soldier.

So if we were to make a short summary of this video, and answer a simple question – “what does George Galloway, who is a British (and had never publicly claimed to be a Muslim) want from his Arab-Muslim audience?”, the answer should be clear, this man wants the same level of violence we are seeing in Syria to happen in Saudi Arabia. “Why would he want that?”, well your guess is as good as mine, but it seems that by the way he glorifies the Iranian regime and shows complete hate to the Saudi one that it must have something to do with Shi’a V Sunni Islam.

Why would they not make things more simple for us?, why wouldn’t George Galloway show up on stage, open up by saying that he is a Shi’a Muslim, that he comes to the stage not as a British national or MP, but as a bloodthirsty religious crazed individual who just wants to see Saudi blood in the streets for glory of his (and his friends) version of Islam. That would just make it easier to ignore the noise coming from his direction.

Gods and Football

June 13, 2012 by Leave a Comment

Screen Shot 2012-06-13 at 10.22.18 — If I hate Bacon - Why do I hate BLT?

A quick look into “The Guardian” of yesterday introduced me to a new style of complaint from Muslims, it is almost magical how the evolution of Muslim taking offense at virtually anything has progressed over the years, to try and make things more simple – imagine that you are reading this not in the year 2012 but in, say, 1982, only 30 years ago this kind of text would produce mainly laughs and jokes at the expanse of its author, not now, now it seems that anyone who is not Islamic in Europe accepts the fact that it is the original inhabitants of the continent (and England) to please and avoid offense of Islamists at any and all costs. Well, not so.

Click the photo on top to read this confused and, at best, arrogant opinion column, of a person who thinks that in order for himself to feel comfortable to join in the ranks of the English supporters they whole idea of English football needs to change, because he finds some of those things they do offensive.

A few very important points show that the author is unaware (or is aware but pretends not to be) of many historical facts and moral grounds that should be pretty clear to anyone living in England today. The very first point is the crusades, the writer feels bad when he sees English supporters dressed as Christian knights, because that reminds him – actually that makes him think of (since he was not there in person) of the crusades – “The Crusades are romanticised in the west as heroic battles to win back the holy lands in the name of Christianity. But for Muslims they are remembered as two centuries of brutal and unprovoked attacks on Arab lands.”

Please pay attention to “unprovoked attack on Arab lands” because this is the same claim Al-Queda lays to ownership of Spain and parts France, because they believe that anything that was once Muslim is forever Muslim (god told them so). Well, the Muslims invaded Jerusalem, a city build by Jews, a city that – for hundreds of years was exclusively Jewish only to be taken by the Romans and convert to Christianity along with the whole of the Roman empire. Only after hundreds of years of Jewish ownership it moved, by force, to Roman, turned Christian and moved into Muslim hands by invasion and force.

Christians who went to the Middle East to gain back a land were not occupiers of any sort, rather they were owners moving in on the aggressors to take back what belonged to them. According to the behavior of just about anyone at that time the march to Jerusalem was a bloody business, not only for Muslims but for Jews as well, however you never hear them complain about the crusades.

So Englad supporters remind you of how your ancestors occupied by force lands that did not belong to them and they had not built or nourished, and upsets you because of the mere resistance to your religions aggressive and violent nature? that is a shame indeed.

Here is another gem – “There’s an irony in the fact that images of Polish supporters chanting antisemitic slogans and giving Nazi salutes have been met with such deserved outrage, but to brandish a sword and recall the brutal and bloody invasion of Muslim lands is portrayed as harmless banter”. Polish supporters who embrace the Nazi ideology are idiots who do not know their own country history, Poland had suffered immensely by the hands of the Nazis, the first prisoners in Awschwits were Polish (non Jews) and the Nazi government set out to eliminate the whole upper social level of Poland’s society.

The last bit – “I wonder how England supporters would react to scenes at the 2022 World Cup in Qatar, were masses of Arab fans to dress up in Saladin turbans and brandish Saracen swords emblazoned with Qu’ranic verse. I’m not sure it would be seen as friendly high jinx.” – only time will tell, however it would not be a great surprise to find out that any females who plan to visit the warm climate country in the 2022 world cup would be celebrating in the stadiums with bikinis and shorts, or to see supporters sitting down for a bear at a corner pub. Of course these things will be instantly embraced as a positive thing, however have nothing to do with human rights or basic freedoms.

The fact is that the author of this text is simple not really English, he may hold an English (British) passport and live in the country, but he does not connect himself to the history and culture of that country, and he makes it worst by further embracing his religion and misconceptions about historical events (who are dictated by the religious narrative of this religion), this person has nothing to do with the real England supporters for he does not support England.