Atheism Corner

Humanity in Progress

Powered by Genesis

Comfort Could Mean Death

May 2, 2011 by 1 Comment

Scary title, ha?

I love TED, its probably my most visited site over the years, and I spend most of my lunch time in front of one of its many brilliant talks, it never failed me, well, until yesterday. As I was tuning in for one of the talks, I saw a presentation called “A radical experiment in Empathy” by sociologist Sam Richards, the name alone got me thinking and I went in and clicked it.

This presenter is obviously an educated man, he also presents well and has some sense of drama and theater in him, the keynote is designed well as well. I do encourage you to go and see at least the few opening minutes of his talk. And why was I so disappointed by what he said? Well, because I think he got it all wrong, and I also think that if a man of this standing could get it SO wrong and go out to display it to the world there are many others that do the same thing.

I do not know Mr. Sam Richards, and I have not a clue as to what he did and who he is beyond the very short description on TED, but it seems to me that he had come to the conclusion that we need to put ourselves in the shoes of others to really and truly understand them, and I agree. But he does it all wrong. See, he plays a little game and tries to think like an person living in Iraq, he tries to show the audience how easy it is to see the Americans as a religious fanatics coming to wage war on them because of their resources. Maybe he thought of this idea in his office in the university for a long time, maybe even his whole career, maybe he went to Iraq and lived with a family for a few years and discussed with them day in and day out the meaning of the war, maybe.

If he did, he missed the point.

To assume that the average Iraqi did not experience any grief or trouble before the American invasion, to think that the Iraqi people are all more or less the same, to assume that fear and terror is new to them is a mistake. Iraq, like many other countries in that region, is made of tribes, if you move further away you will see that most of those tribes focus on a different version of religion, if you’re Iraqi Muslim you can be sonnie or shiite, you can also be a Kurd, and all of these tribes have got bad blood between them for ages. To add to this their version of religion determines that the other versions are so wrong that its followers are infidels and need to be destroyed. Another thing that is common to all the versions is an apocalyptic story about the end of time, and it usually involves some outer force coming in and during bad things, so that any event like this soon sparks the nutters and crazies into action.

I did not do my own research, but I do know how many Muslims think, or better yet – follow their leaders thoughts, there is no place for empathy, infidels are on earth to stop and delay the coming of the glory-ending of this place, they are an obstacle to anything that is good and as long as these infidels live there will not be a happy ending and god will not be pleased. There is no regard to children of infidels because if they will stop and start to think about them they could not decapitate them or their parents. The war that is going on now, in eyes of religious Muslims, makes complete sense because if they would have the power they would quickly do the same to the west, as is commanded in their holy books and scripture.

The comfort of live leads many to sit and ponder why things are the way they are (“why does the Arab world hate us?”) and one can easily make the mistake of thinking that everyone is the same, that education systems around the world are the same, and that cultures all teach the same thing. But that is not true, and from that very basic mistake you get a 20 minute talk about something that is just not real, and probably the worst TED talk I ever saw.

The only good that this talk can do is to show people how well intentioned individuals can make inflated theories of people when they do not know what motivates these people and who they really are, what education and belief systems that follow and to what degree.

Filed Under: Free Speech, General

Nice People That Get Angry, Sometimes

April 23, 2011 by Leave a Comment

I’m a nice person. My family thinks so, my friends think so and the people in my area also think so.

They all know that I love my favorite basketball team, that I think it has always been the best, is the best and will continue to be the best, forever. My friends know that I am very passionate about my team, I go to all the games, I know all the players, watch games over and over, and learn the history of the team by heart.

Other people know that even though I am a nice person I do not tolerate anyone who does not respect my team. I understand that there are other fans out there, that’s OK, by I also know that these people are stupid and have no idea what is the game, because they cheer for a bunch of losers that will never win. Only my team will EVER win. So when I realize I got a fan of another team in my house I kick him out, and I do not care if he is the doctor treating my kid for its kidney disease.

That’s also why I would kill any fan of other teams that will even suggest to my kids to follow a different team, or hang a flag of that team outside my house, or anywhere that is visible from my house. I mean, come on, everyone knows how passionate I am about this, why toy with me? Just so I react with full blown aggression and murderous rage?

That’s why last week I sent my city a letter telling them that if any challenging team will pass in the vicinity of my house I will try and destroy anyone on the bus, or car, and no one can say I did not warm them, that is just how passionate I am!

In other news, Terry Jones will probably go to jail, because apparently he is responsible for provoking passionate people to kill other people by his actions, GO TIGERS!!!

Filed Under: Free Speech, General, Islam

Sticking It to the Man (Fox That Is)

February 22, 2011 by Leave a Comment

Now this one I love, not because I do not like Fox news (I actually like some of it, and I also enjoy hearing other people’s ideas and opinions, as crazy as it might seem), but because these people and especially “that guy” are not afraid to say what they (seem to) believe very strongly.

This is one fine example of how a real democracy acts, how media coverage is not hiding from criticism (as brutal as it might be) and most of all – how free speech and personal liberties can be used every day and in any case. Enjoy.

Filed Under: Free Speech, General, News Tagged With: democracy, fox lies, fox news, free speech

Iran Likes Revolutions, Hangs Protestors

February 17, 2011 by Leave a Comment

Wait!

Iran happy to hang protestors

That does not make sense, Iran politicians were pretty happy about the revolution and change in Egypt, as well as what looks like a beginning of protests in Bahrain, but somehow what’s good for other countries is not what is the preffered plan of action for Iran, so they just pick up the Iranians that are protesting and hang them up – problem solved.

What this should mean, to any free loving person out there, is that Iran is probably the most problematic place on earth (now that South Sudan is almost there), trying to get its reach and influence around its region, and in the same time brutally forcing its own population to submit to what seems like a very un-democratic state.

Eventualy, as we all know, there is no way to opress people without paying the price, in which case means that Iran will, one day, be free, the stronger they try and force it down the fast it will rise up. We should all admire the brave youth of Iran in their fight for equality and freedom.

Iran supports revolution outside - hanging inside

Filed Under: Free Speech, Iran

Lets Argue About Ancient Histroy – in Court

February 15, 2011 by Leave a Comment

It seems there is a legal process in Austria these days against a woman who does not like the teachings of Islam, who has read the book and learned the issues around it, and who has talked to other people about what she thinks it means.

I’m attaching some information about the day in court, not sure that it is an exact exrept of the legal discussion and the verdict, but I think this makes the whole thing very clear. Talking about what someone may or may have not wanted or might have done, when this someone is now dead for centuries, and attributing serious meaning to whatever is being said about that person (if he ever walked the face of earth) as well as the implications of any or every move he did or did not make… to me this is nuts.

Pay attention to the root of the discussion –

The judgment against the defendant is a €480 fine.

The judge second-guessed the Koran by saying Aisha was 18. She evidently noted that Aisha was 18 years old when Mohammed died, which is factual. The implication is that because he did not divorce her after she became above legal age, he was not a pedophile.

She says it’s not pedophilia, because Mohammed had no exclusive desire for underage girls; he wanted any female he could get his hands on.

By implication, the child marriages so prevalent in hardcore Islamic countries cannot be legally categorized as “pedophilia” either.

You can check it out in much more detail on The gates of Vienna which is a very serious blog about the dangers of Islam, and what seems to be a passionate advocate of freedom of speech, if this world would have 1,000 more like these bunch of bloggers, it will be a better place – not just right now but in the future.

Filed Under: Free Speech, Islam

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4